Remember growing up and watching TV or the movies where the characters would sometimes get devoured by quicksand. Just one false step and the substance would suck the living victim down into an inescapable, perhaps bottomless pit with very little opportunity for self-rescue. It made for good movie plots…and when the victim disappeared from sight and would never be heard from again…about the only evidence of their unfortunate plight was usually a cowboy hat floating on the surface of the mysterious sand.
I can’t help but think that the once popular Jim Zumbo, Outdoor Life’s long-time hunting editor, has stepped into the proverbial “quicksand.” Comments made on his blog post from last Friday have stirred such a raw passion (perhaps call it an obsession) in cyberspace among many gun owners the likes of which have never been seen by this group in the modern age of internet communication. In a nutshell, Zumbo posted on his blog that he saw no legitimate purpose [my words] for the “assault” style rifles in the hunting community. In fact, he went on to refer to them as “terrorist weapons.” In a matter of hours after making this faux pas, Zumbo was the topic of a fire storm of folks looking to hang his storied outdoor writing career and his personal reputation at the stake.
So, you don’t think any of this is serious business, huh? Well, think again. Not only has Outdoor Life removed Zumbo’s blog from their website and issued a statement instead…Remington Arms has also quickly acted to sever all ties to their once high-vis outdoor spokesperson. In a bit of irony, Zumbo was actually with some of Remington’s top brass testing Remington products during a coyote hunt earlier in the day when the infamous blog post was made later that evening. Some insiders believe that sponsors like Cabela’s, Gerber Knives, and others could now drop like dominos thanks to this expanding P.R. nightmare Zumbo has created for himself. Ultimately, I’d be surprised if Zumbo’s television show sponsorships don’t also begin to dry up, too, as companies act to divist themselves from this proven lightening rod of a spokesperson.
Perhaps the best place to begin reading this now infamous blog post is here.
Click here to see that this controversy has even hit the mainstream newspapers and I’m sure more will follow.
For a good sampling of what other bloggers and forum users are saying about Zumbo, click here, here, here, here, here, here and here.
I think we can all agree that what Zumbo said was a really stupid thing. Hell, he even admits that now…“activating his mouth before engaging his brain.” On Sunday during the Gun Talk Radio program with Tom Gresham, Zumbo was a guest and used that nationwide forum to explain himself and offer an apology. In effect, he stated how he had underestimated the popularity of “AR-15 style guns” with sportsmen throughout the country. You can down-load and listen to the entire interview here. I might add several of the callers who followed Zumbo rejected his apology and his reasoning.
I guess here’s the problem I have with Zumbo. Granted, he is a self-professed “hunting writer” and not much of a “gun writer.” I suppose it’s possible to be one exclusive of the other…but that doesn’t quite cut it for me. Look, Zumbo boasts on his personal website that he has hunted deer in every state. Personally, I have always hated that sort of in-your-face opportunity gluttony when many sportsmen who help support the corporate sponsors for this guy feel lucky to hunt in just their own home state. How can a guy with that much hunting experience, lucky enough to travel throughout the country, be so ignorant and unaware of what many common sportsmen perceive as important guns in their hunting collection.
Yup, Zumbo stepped into the equivalent of the bloggers quicksand with his comments posted last Friday night. Stated he was tired after a long day in the field and didn’t give much thought to what he was writing about before hitting the “send” button on his computer. If you ever needed an example of just what a powerful tool the blog can be just look how it has changed Zumbo’s life. When all is said and done, it just might be Zumbo’s big ol’ hat that we find floating on the quicksand as evidence someone recently treaded where perhaps they ought not to have been.
© 2007 Jim Braaten. All Rights Reserved. No Reproduction Allowed Without Prior Permission.
Filed under: Current Outdoor Issues, Outdoor Media (TV/Newspaper/Radio), Outdoor Personalities, Shooting Sports







I have been following this story all day and even though I feel bad for the poor guy I just can’t agree with his stance on the issue of assault weapons.
I hope they ease up on him a bit though.
Shame about Jim Zumbo. Despite the current anti Zubmo mood I keep supporting him. What counts for me is not what the man said one time but what he has done all of his life. He has done more for hunting and the 2nd. Amendment than many of those that bash him now. I wish the same people who have been so vocal about Zumbo’s “slip of the thong” would be as vocal in public when the anti gun lobby spouts their agenda at nausea. There is hope that given time firearm owners will realize that they flogged one of their own instead of the ones who really threaten the 2nd Amendment.
-Othmar Vohringer-
Who is intelligent and who is stupid?
So much good that Mr. Zumbo has done for ethical hunters so quickly undone. It is like when Copernicus told the world the earth was not the center of the universe. Let’s draw and quarter him for not believing as we do, which is so obviously correct!
I am sure Mr. Zumbo realizes that muzzle loaders, repeating rifles, and even bolt action rifles were at one time assault weapons in their time.
What I think he is advocating is a certain standard of sportsmanship in hunting, and not just a massacring of wildlife because we have the technology.
Maybe a thoughtful discussion should have ensued instead of a knee-jerk reaction?
I don’t normally read blogs and first heard of the Zumbo incident on the Colbert Report the other evening. But I grew up reading all the outdoor mags and still remember all the educational and crotchety things every outdoor scribbler ever wrote. What I want to know is, Who’s gonna fill their shoes? Can we go back to the normative, prescriptive debate about fast and light bullets vs big and heavy? If Jack O’Connor or Warren Page had not had NYC editors they would have come up with some even wilder statements than they did. We used to take them in stride, recognizing the competition for entertaining readers in colorful ways, before political correctness set in like gangrene. But the nation used to be 80% farmers who felt guns were just tools. Are bloggers going to replace the media that defined hunting and shooting to an urbanizing America in the past? Can we revisit both the first and second amendments and the ‘Hell, I was there’ attitude even if we don’t agree with it every time?
Its a shame a career can be ruin with one blog article seems to me one has to be very careful what they write.
Teen sex.
Teen sex.